Reinforcements 101:
Introduction
The development of stitch bonded, multiaxial reinforcements
has allowed for faster fabrication of parts
with better physical and mechanical properties. Parts made from these
reinforcements
have led
to cost effective solutions for a variety
of applications including marine, transportation, infrastructure, sports
and recreation
and aerospace.
The cost effective solution begins with engineering
the laminate requirements at the point of fabric
manufacture. As you will see, the strength demands
can be engineered right into the reinforcement
by considering fiber weight and fiber angle of any given ply. Stitch-bonding
fabric is essentially
an automated process and highly efficient
compared
to a shop fabricated laminate using unidirectional or
woven fabrics.
Comparison of non-crimp and woven fabrics
While some composite builders continue to use a combination
woven roving and chopped mat, the nature
of weaving fabric has limitations. The crimping of yarns, inherent in
weaving, causes stress points in
the laminate and a subsequent knockdown in
strength. Pound for pound non-crimp reinforcements are 30% stronger
than woven fabrics. Secondly,
the coarse surface created by the weaving
of fibers translates into poor shear properties because of less fiber-to-fiber
contact. Third,
the interstices created by the weave allow
resin
to pool amongst the rovings contributing to lower
properties, adding unwanted weight and
cost - see Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cross section of woven fabric. When a load is applied to
a woven fabric a stress concentration occurs at every point where one
fiber bundle passes over or under another. This causes unwanted stresses
in the resin, which is much weaker than the fibers. Repeated loading
and unloading, or cycle fatigue, will cause a breakdown of the resin
leaving the fibers unsupported and free to buckle in compression loading.
Pound for pound non-crimp stitched reinforcements are 30% stronger than
woven fabrics.

Figure 2.
Woven roving 24 oz: The woven fabric, with larger surface
interstices, has lower shear properties compared to non-crimp fabrics
and will depend upon the resin for ultimate strength.


Figure 3 & 4.
The cross section of non-crimp stitch bonded fabrics’ show how fibers
are straight and directly aligned with the load path. The surface finish,
having fewer interstices, less likely to print through, consumes less
resin, and has better shear properties.
Multiple fiber architecture for multiple benefits
Stitch bonded fabrics offer greater range and flexibility compared to
woven fabrics, especially in the field of multiaxial (3 plies or more).
Multiaxial reinforcements can be engineered to meet specific requirements
and perform multiple tasks such as providing good surface finish, impact
and abrasion resistance, and structural integrity, all in one fabric.
Just as important as the properties, is the element of cost. When the
cost to fabricate a composite part becomes a large percentage of the total
cost, engineers look to multiaxial reinforcements as a way to reduce fabrication
time and therefore reduce labor cost. One example is Vectorply’s
E-QXM 4008; a 40oz quad (1326/244 gsm) with chopped mat which is a single
ply replacement for the traditional 2 fabric laminate of a 17oz double
bias and 18oz biaxial.
Furthermore, the ability to place fibers on 0º, 90º, +45º,
-45º, (see figure 1) means engineers can design composite laminates
to handle loads from both the known and unknown directions. Quadraxial
reinforcements are closer to the traditional building materials like steel
and aluminum i.e. equal strength in all directions. The predictability
of quadraxial laminates has created a comfort zone with engineers which
has opened the door for new applications such as composite bridge decks,
and infrastructure rehabilitation to name a few.

Figure 5.
Stitch bonded example-Quadraxial. Typical quadraxial ply
stack includes 0º, 90º, +45º, and –45º plies.
They are often made balanced (equal weight on all axes) but can also
be tailored to suit a particular load case such as the typical boat
bottom panel where bending occurs mostly in the transverse direction.
In this case quads are designed with more 90º fiber than the other
axis.
How it’s made
The machines are ‘fed’ with fiber from coils or roving packages
(see fig. 6). The weight of each ply or layer is determined by the bulk
of the roving bundle and the spacing between the bundles when stitched
together. Fibers running in the direction of the roll are called the warp,
longitudinal, or 0º direction. Fibers on any angle between 0º -
90º (+, - 45º is common) are called off axis, weft, or transverse,
are transported by carriages that are driven back and forth across a conveyor
belt moving towards the stitch beam. Hooks on the edge of the belt capture
the fibers and hold them in place until they reach the stitch beam where
all the plies are combined by polyester yarn. The finished fabric is then
rolled, boxed, wrapped in plastic to seal out moisture, and loaded onto
pallets ready for shipment.

Figure 6.
Machines are ‘fed’ with fiber from coils, or roving packages
housed in creel racks.

Figure 7.
Multiaxis machine. Cross-plies of +45º, 90º, -45º or angle
in between 22º and 90º are laid in place by a carriage that
shuttles back and forth across the width of the roll.

Figure 8.
The stitch style and density is critical to the performance
and handling of the fabric. The stitch pattern (chain,
tricot, modified tricot, etc.), the frequency (courses per inch in the
roll direction
or 0º axis), and gauge (rows of stitching across the roll width)
all impact the behavior of the finished fabric. The needles are mounted
on the stitch bar, which can simultaneously move vertically, and horizontally
to form the desired stitch pattern. Stitch yarn is most commonly polyester
but in some cases can be fiberglass or Nomex® depending upon the
application.


Figure 9 & 10.
Once the fabric is stitched it is slit to specified widths
and taken up on rolls.

Figure 11.
Material rolls are then boxed or bagged and ready for shipment.